Мислим да они имају у виду суд по Шариа закону. Овде су чињенице са Хашког суда. Према оригиналним сведочанствима, пуцање НИJЕ био са стране Срба.
20 A. Very briefly, I do not doubt at all that the shelling of Markale
21 did not happen from the Serb side, and there is evidence to corroborate
22 this.
23 Q. Thank you. What can you tell us regarding the investigation that
24 was conducted, if you, that is, know something about that?
25 A. As early as 1996, Yasushi Akashi in his interview to a German
Page 19462
1 paper said that there was a document about the UN investigations showing
2 that it was not done by the Serb side. David Owen speaks about that --
3 writes about that in his book and does it very eloquently. If there were
4 enough time, I'd quote it.
5 Q. You say -- you say in your report that David Owen said that his
6 information could not be revealed -- or who said that the United Nations
7 decided that such information should not be revealed, should not be
8 disclosed? So how do you know these things?
9 THE WITNESS: [Interpretation] Could the interpreter speak up,
10 please.
11 David Owen writes in his book that there were four reasons for
12 which this information should not be disclosed. One of the reasons is
13 that NATO troops were already ready to strike positions and that changed
14 plans completely. The second reason, where possible refusal of
15 Alija Izetbegovic to take part in further negotiations, which was very
16 important. The third reason was that everybody was already convinced,
17 that is, everybody was quite sure that allegedly this shell had come from
18 the Serb side and that completely changed the picture of what had
19 happened. And one of the principal reasons was that it could have
20 prejudiced the authority of the United Nations.
http://www.icty.org/x/cases/galic/trans/en/030212IT.htm