Citiraj:
Fairly early on in the game, you need to make decisions about whether you sympathise with a group of bitter elves who are essentially terrorists, or side with a human governor who’s working to protect his people but is openly racist in his attitudes. It’s not easy. The elves (and to a lesser extent so far dwarves) are violently angry about their treatment, and righteously so – but that means other lives are placed in danger.
zar nije ovo radnja prvog djela?
Citiraj:
The collection and construction of mega-loot is a proper and satisfying quest in itself. For instance, collecting a certain amount of Endraga jaws to build a powerful sword, or scouring local traders for rare materials to create a new set of armour. It’s all done off your own back, in your own interest, not just because some near-motionless goon with a quest arrow has inexplicably demanded you collect 12 pig testicles for him. It’s meaningful to you, not to a silent NPC.
interesantno.......
jedna od rijetkih stvari koje mi se nisu svidjele u prvom djelu su samo 3 oklopa.
Citiraj:
This isn’t the X-Men, this is a guy who clobbers stuff with a sword but has a few parlour tricks to help out.
ovaj citat treba da stoji kd pokrenes igricu
Citiraj:
It’s a morally and politically complicated place, on a micro to a macro level. Is slaying a murderous troll under a bridge necessarily a good idea, given he could legitimately keep bad sorts from entering town if only you can talk him out of whatever blood-crazed doldrums he’s in? Is a king who’s sired bastard children and embarked on arguably unnecessary wars a bad king, or does his general conviction and generosity make him a better ruler than most? Or is he just a man, and should be thought of as such? There’s an awful lot of politics in the Witcher 2;
ovo mi se jako svidjelo u knjizi.
jos ako ove godine prevedu ostale djelove knjige,ih veselja
Prijavite se
Registruj se
FAQ
Pretraga
)
